Mathis v. Lockwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court abused its discretion in failing to set aside default judgment where testimony established that notice was sent but not received
• holding that counsel’s oral testimony that documents were properly served was not prima facie proof of service
• holding that when notice is challenged under Rule 21a, it must be proved \according to the rule\
• holding that oral assurance by attorney showed only that notice was mailed, not received, and finding no other evidence in record proving receipt of notice
• holding that trial court abused its discretion in failing to set aside default judgment where testimony established that notice was sent but not received
• holding that oral assurance by attorney that notice was mailed, was insufficient to show that notice was received, and finding no other evidence in record proving receipt of notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).