· 9/19/2002
Mathis v. Housing Authority of Umatilla County
Citations
- 242 F. Supp. 2d 777
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25544
- 2002 WL 31973841
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an award of a penalty under a similar Oregon statute “and an award of liquidated damages under the FLSA do not constitute a double recovery”
- applying \the same FLSA analysis\ to plaintiffs Oregon state law claims to determine whether plaintiff was an employee or,an independent contractor
- “[T]he issue of [the plaintiffs] desire to be an independent contractor does not alter the economic reality that she was an employee.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.