Mathis v. Heath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that knowledge of the decision to discipline the plaintiff and power to push for a different response was enough for a reasonable jury to treat supervisor as sufficiently involved in two cases to allow a fair comparison
• analyzing Title VII and § 1981 claims under the same framework
• erroneously telling EEOC that deci‐ sion maker was not aware of an allegation against a compar‐ ator is not sufficient to support an inference of discrimination when there was no other evidence “corroborating unlawful intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).