· 12/22/2005
Mathis v. Hargrove
Citations
- 888 A.2d 377
- 166 Md. App. 286
- 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 306
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to review one argument on appeal because no authority for the position was cited
- refusing to review one argument on appeal because no authority for the position was cited
- motion court has discretion to deny motion for summary judgment even when all technical requirements are met by movant
- “The proper standard in a civil action . . . is the ‘preponderance of the evidence’ standard.”
- “We begin by accepting appellants’ premise that the circuit court’s reservation of its ruling on the motion for summary judgment effectively operated to deny the motion.”
- real estate broker did not cite authority for its argument that the contracting broker was an independent contractor, and thus, the argument would not be reviewed on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Salmon, Adkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.