Skip to main content
· 11/12/2009

Mathis v. ERA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.

Citations

  • 25 So. 3d 298
  • 2009 Miss. LEXIS 535
  • 2009 WL 3765545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \A review of cases from other jurisdictions reveals that the doctrine is almost always employed in purely intracorporate disputes.\
  • “[I]n determining whether the action belongs to the corporation or the individual, the focus of the inquiry is whether the corporation or the individual suffered injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carlson, Kitchens, Chandler, Waller, Graves, Dickinson, Lamar, Pierce, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.