Mathias Njang Etchu-Njang v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America, 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the doctrine of issue exhaustion serves the salutary purpose of giving the agency an opportunity to address the disputed issue in the first instance”
• concluding that even if counsel was ineffective, there was no due process violation because applicant has no constitutionally protected liberty interest in cancellation-of-removal relief
• recognizing that \the doctrine of issue exhaustion serves the salutary purpose of giving the agency an opportunity to address the disputed issue in the first instance\
• holding exhaustion not required because motion to reopen is not relief available as of right
• noting that 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(c) requires an alien to exhaust both administrative remedies and issues before judicial review and citing cases in support
• explaining that the similar doctrine of issue exhaustion in general \serves the salutary purpose of giving the agency an opportunity to address the disputed issue in the first instance\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).