Skip to main content
· 2/18/1929

Mathey Bros. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Citations

  • 30 F.2d 1014
  • 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • presumption of joint contribution rebutted where husband was not employed and “there is no evidence that husband contributed to the marriage as a homemaker, or that he made sustained contributions * * * to the maintenance of the acreage on which the family home is located”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.