Mathewson v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant’s objections and the arguments of the parties adequately placed the issues before the court
• noting that courts need not “expressly weigh each factor in § 3B1.2 on the record”
• affirming denial of role adjustment where defendant physically transported marihuana within the United States as part of a distribution chain and was paid for his participation
• finding no clear error where the only evidence of the “participation of others . . . pertain[ed] to the other individuals who had transported the drugs” and were “no more or less culpable”
• describing the list in Section 3B1.2’s commentary as “nonexclusive” and “only factors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).