Mathewson v. Primeau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “That a thing is unsightly or offends the aesthetic sense of a neighbor, does not 8 ordinarily make it a nuisance or afford ground for injunctive relief.”
• involving a hog farm and junkyard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Personal Restraint of King
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-06-23· cited 122×
• Tiegs v. Watts
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-04-23· cited 57×
• Wernke v. Halas
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-09-28· cited 48×
• State v. Browet, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-12-06· cited 45×
• State v. Primeau
  Washington Supreme Court· 1966-12-29· cited 39×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-12-30· cited 19×
• In RE DETENTION OF BROER v. State
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-06-15· cited 18×
• Allison v. Smith
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1984-12-20· cited 15×
• Holiday v. City of Moses Lake
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-05· cited 15×
• Ramstead v. Hauge
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-02-08· cited 8×
• City of Burlington v. Kutzer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-07-09· cited 5×
• Ness v. Albert
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-11-15· cited 5×
• Chambers v. City of Mount Vernon
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-06-03· cited 2×
• Bennion v. Pronto Foods, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-05-06· cited 2×
• King v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-26· cited 1×