Skip to main content

Mathews v. State

Citations

  • 572 S.E.2d 719
  • 258 Ga. App. 29
  • 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 3131
  • 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 1346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • proof that individual identified in indictment as owner of burgled building not required where state proves unauthorized entry
  • testimonial exhibits (including videotapes) \contain their makers' assertion of purported truths [and] are ascribed evidentiary value only to the extent that their makers are credible\ (quoting Sagenich v. State, 255 Ga.App. 663, 566 S.E.2d 327, 328 (2002))
  • testimonial exhibits (including videotapes) \contain their makers' assertion of purported truths [and] are ascribed eviden-tiary value only to the extent that their makers are credible\ (quoting Sagemich v. State, 255 Ga.App. 668, 566 S.E.2d 827, 328 (2002)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Smith, Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.