Mathews v. Schonwald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[No] state law has been preempted by the (9th Cir. 2001) (holding that “[the sovereign] still must allege injury in fact to the citizens they purport to represent as parens patriae”
• “A motion to dismiss for lack of standing proceeds under Rule 12(b)(1) because ‘the defect of standing is a defect in subject matter jurisdiction.’” (quoting Haase v. Sessions, 835 F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. Cir. 1987))
• “Several contingent and speculative events must occur before the OCC charters a Fintech: (1) the OCC must decide to finalize a procedure for handling those applications; (2) a Fintech company must choose to apply for a charter; (3
• \A motion to dismiss for lack of standing proceeds under Rule 12(b)(1) because 'the defect of standing is a defect in subject matter jurisdiction.' \ (quoting Haase v. Sessions , 835 F.2d 902 , 906 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).