Mathews v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the denial of apportionment between an industrial injury and preexisting congenital condition, not because the condition was congenital, but because the proposed apportionment was based on an arbitrary, speculative medical opinion
• physician’s testimony that his apportionment recommendation was “somewhat arbitrary” showed his recommendation was “[m]ere conjecture” insufficient to support 19 apportionment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).