Skip to main content
· 6/10/1916

Mathews v. Hogueland

Citations

  • 98 Kan. 342
  • 157 P. 1179
  • 1916 Kan. LEXIS 81

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE .COURT.</p> <p>1. Sale — Bank Stock — Representations as to Value — No Evidence of Bad Faith. The evidence examined and held to have no tendency to show that one who sold bank stock under a representation that it was worth double its face value had any knowledge that the bank was insolvent.</p> <p>2. Same. An owner’s representation of the value of property he offers for sale is not actionable if made in good faith, even where by reason of facts unknown to him its ownership is a liability instead of an asset.</p>

Judges: Mason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.