Skip to main content
· 3/17/2006

Mathews v. Hixson Brothers, Inc.

Citations

  • 925 So. 2d 548
  • 2006 La. LEXIS 983
  • 2006 WL 1050728

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if agency position likely to be modified before put into effect, review wastes court's time
  • if interests of those who seek review outweigh interests of court and agency in postponing review, question is ripe for review
  • if agency position likely to be abandoned or modified before put into effect, court review interferes with process by which agency is attempting to reach final determination
  • if interests of those who seek review outweigh interests of court and agency in postponing review, question is ripe for review
  • if agency position likely to be modified before put into effect, review wastes court’s time
  • if agency position likely to be abandoned or modified before put into effect, court review interferes with process by which agency is attempting to reach final determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knoll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.