· 3/17/2006
Mathews v. Hixson Brothers, Inc.
Citations
- 925 So. 2d 548
- 2006 La. LEXIS 983
- 2006 WL 1050728
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if agency position likely to be modified before put into effect, review wastes court's time
- if interests of those who seek review outweigh interests of court and agency in postponing review, question is ripe for review
- if agency position likely to be abandoned or modified before put into effect, court review interferes with process by which agency is attempting to reach final determination
- if interests of those who seek review outweigh interests of court and agency in postponing review, question is ripe for review
- if agency position likely to be modified before put into effect, review wastes court’s time
- if agency position likely to be abandoned or modified before put into effect, court review interferes with process by which agency is attempting to reach final determination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knoll
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.