Mathews v. Fluor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the FAA did not apply where the parties were residents of separate states and the real property was in yet another separate state
• “The requirement that the underlying transaction involve commerce is to be broadly construed so as to be coextensive with congressional power to regulate under the Commerce Clause.”
• “Commerce, as defined in the Act, evidences transactions involving interstate or foreign commerce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).