· 8/24/2001
Mathews v. Denver Post
Citations
- 263 F.3d 1164
- 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 250
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4354
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19057
- 2001 WL 967797
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- listing the third element as “suffered adverse employment action because of the disability”
- recog- nizing that “an employer is not required to accommodate a disabled worker by modifying or eliminating an essential function of the job”
- “The idea of accommodation is to enable an employee to perform the essential functions of his job; an employer is not required to accommodate a disabled worker by modifying or eliminating an essential function of the job.”
- “The idea of accommodation is to enable an employee to perform the essential functions of his job; an employer is not required to accommodate a disabled worker by modifying or eliminating an essential function of the job.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, Gibson, Briscoe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.