Skip to main content
· 7/24/1995

Mathews v. Chater

Citations

  • 891 F. Supp. 186
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10660
  • 1995 WL 441966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a determination is only final after the Appeals Council has denied review or decided the case after review
  • finding that claimant did not proffer evidence of “physical harm or evidence of the type of harm that would rise to the level of irreparable injury to excuse the exhaustion requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.