Skip to main content
· 6/1/1961

Mathews v. Carlson

Citations

  • 130 So. 2d 625
  • 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a PCRA petition based on information discovered during habeas proceedings must be filed within 60 days of receipt of that -7- J-S63025-19 information
  • noting that the PCRA 2 Specifically, seven counts of possession with intent to deliver, 35 P.S. § 780- 113(a)(30); one count of possession of a controlled substance, 35 P.S. § 780- 113(a)(16
  • explaining that a PCRA petition, including a second or subsequent petition, must be filed within one year of the date the petitioner’s judgment of sentence became final, unless he pleads and proves an exception to the PCRA time bar
  • recognizing the PCRA’s timeliness provisions are jurisdictional in nature
  • noting it is a petitioner’s burden to prove a timeliness exception
  • “The [PCRA’s] timeliness requirements apply to all PCRA petitions, regardless of the nature of the individual claims raised therein.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Milledge, Pearson, Stanley, Tillman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.