Skip to main content
· 4/12/2018

MATHEW CRAVEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that payments for on-the-job injuries labeled as “sick pay” qualified for exclusion
  • apparently accepting that Cal. Lab. Code sec. 4850 is a statute in the nature of a workmen’s compensation act
  • apparently accepting that Cal. Lab. Code sec. 4850 is a statute in the nature of a workmen's compensation act
  • apparently accepting that Cal. Lab. Code sec. 4850 is a statute in the nature of a workmen’s compensation act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.