Skip to main content
· 1/25/1982

Mathes v. Carlson

Citations

  • 534 F. Supp. 226
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no leave to amend to assert class action where Rule 23 obviously could not be satisfied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell G. Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.