Mather v. Darst
Citations
- 11 S.D. 480
- 78 N.W. 954
- 1899 S.D. LEXIS 22
Syllabus
<p>1. A motion by respondent to file a supplemental abstract, denying that an undertaking on appeal was served, four monlbs after tbe case was submitted on the merits, will be denied.</p> <p>2. Service of undertaking on appeal on the respondents is unnecessary, to confer jurisdiction on the appellate court, under Comp. Laws, §§ 5215, 5219, providing for service of' notice of appeal, and that an undertaking , must be executed by the appellant.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing challenge to ALJ’s persuasiveness evaluation of the claimant’s treating rheumatologist opinion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.