Matheis v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ACA adopts the Rehabilitation Act’s rights and remedies, but not its statute of limitations
• noting that the “Rehabilitation Act’s borrowed statute of limitations” would be “Tennessee’s one-year personal-injury statute of limitations”
• stating that ACA-covered entities “must defer to the individual’s request” of aid
• “Under the Rehabilitaiton Act, public accommodations . . . must ask individuals with disabilities about their choice of aid. . . . [T]he ACA holds all covered health programs . . . must defer to the individual’s request.”
• “[A] bright-line rule . . . brings clarity and consistency”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).