Mathai v. Warren (In Re Warren)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we review decision of bankruptcy court, not decision of BAP, “whose rulings are not entitled to any deference (although they certainly may be persuasive)”
• debtors-accountants denied discharge under § 727(a)(2) for failure to schedule prepaid insurance (and other prepayments of living expenses) as assets
• extensive bankruptcy planning, including sale of coin collection at loss for credit towards new home
• “[W]e review only the Bankruptcy Court’s decision.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[A] party objecting to a discharge under this section 'must show by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) the debtor transferred, removed, concealed, destroyed, or mutilated, (2) property of the estate, (3) within one year prior to the bankruptcy filing, (4
• discussing actual intent to defraud under § 727(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).