Skip to main content
· 2/19/1987

Mateyka v. Schroeder

Citations

  • 504 N.E.2d 1289
  • 152 Ill. App. 3d 854
  • 105 Ill. Dec. 771
  • 1987 Ill. App. LEXIS 2092

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that facts and circumstances proved that an implied agency was created when defendants accepted, without repudiation, benefits conferred upon them
  • “Acquiescence or a failure to repudiate on the part of the person for whose benefit the act was performed will be held to constitute a ratification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kasserman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.