Materials Marketing Corp. v. Spencer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the limitation on which MMC relied was on the back of its preprinted invoice sent to a third party, not to the Spencers, and MMC had no evidence that it notified the Spencers of the limitation of damages or that the Spencers were aware that the invoice had a back side
• explaining that the limitation on which MMC relied was on the back of its preprinted invoice sent to a third party, not to the Spencers, and MMC had no evidence that it notified the Spencers of the limitation of damages or that the Spencers were aware that the invoice had a back side
• allowing for liquidation or limitation of damages by agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).