Mateo v. M/S KISO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]istrict courts are 7 authorized to reconsider interlocutory orders at any time prior to final judgment, independently of 8 Rule 60(b)”
• “Rule 60(b) motions apply only to final judgments, however, and not to interlocutory 23 rulings.”
• “Conclusory, speculative testimony 19 is insufficient to raise genuine issues of fact . . . .”
• ‘To succeed on . . . a motion to reconsider, || a party “must set forth facts or law of a strongly convincing nature to induce the court to reverse its prior decision.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).