Mateo Fabian Gomez Garza v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that refusal evidence is inadmissible on the issue of intoxication based on state constitutional grounds
• “Although he offert d the excuse that he was not trained to do the test, the jury would have been vi arranted in inferring that he thought he could not do the test because he hi d had too much to drink”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).