· 12/21/2009
Matejczyk v. City of Chicago
Citations
- 397 Ill. App. 3d 1
- 922 N.E.2d 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining, for purposes of res judicata, the effect of an earlier order dismissing a claim rather than reviewing what order should have been entered
- considering the court’s specific intent to invoke an exception to the rule against claim- splitting
- considering the court’s specific intent to invoke an exception to the rule against claim-splitting
- bar applies to what was actually decided and what could have been decided
- bar applies to what was actually decided and what could have been decided
- whether claim is barred by res judicata is reviewed de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garcia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.