Skip to main content
· 12/21/2009

Matejczyk v. City of Chicago

Citations

  • 397 Ill. App. 3d 1
  • 922 N.E.2d 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining, for purposes of res judicata, the effect of an earlier order dismissing a claim rather than reviewing what order should have been entered
  • considering the court’s specific intent to invoke an exception to the rule against claim- splitting
  • considering the court’s specific intent to invoke an exception to the rule against claim-splitting
  • bar applies to what was actually decided and what could have been decided
  • bar applies to what was actually decided and what could have been decided
  • whether claim is barred by res judicata is reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garcia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.