Skip to main content
· 5/9/1984

Matco MacHine and Tool Company v. Cincinnati Milacron Company

Citations

  • 727 F.2d 777
  • 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1577
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Due to the circumstances present in this suit, it is also well to note that it is not the purpose of the [Freedom of Information] Act to benefit private litigants by serving as a supplement to the rules of civil discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson, McMILLIAN, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.