Skip to main content
· 12/4/2003

Mataraza v. Newburgh Enlarged City School District

Citations

  • 294 F. Supp. 2d 483
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21751
  • 2003 WL 22872323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting plaintiffs argument that the defendant must demonstrate that his speech actually disrupted the workplace
  • rejecting plaintiffs argument that the defendant must demonstrate that his speech actually disrupted the workplace

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMahon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.