Matao Yokeno v. Sawako Sekiguchi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Our precedent directs us to consider only the American citizenship of a dual citizen for purposes of determining diversity.”
• “Our precedent directs us to consider only the American citizenship of a dual citizen for purposes of determining diversity”
• “Unlike the 12 Constitution, the diversity statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, requires complete diversity of citizenship.”
• “A corporation, for example, is expressly ‘deemed to be a citizen of every State and foreign state by which [they have] been incorporated and of the State or foreign state where it has its principal place of business.’”
• “A corporation, for example, is expressly ‘deemed to be a citizen of every State and foreign state by which [they have] been incorporated and of the State or foreign state where it has its principal place of business.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).