Skip to main content
· 8/28/1992

Matao C. Yokeno v. Ramon C. Mafnas

Citations

  • 973 F.2d 803
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 12006
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7368
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20194
  • 1992 WL 206341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing whether plaintiffs complaint presented a “substantial federal question”
  • analyzing whether plaintiff’s complaint presented a “substantial federal question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Beezer, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.