Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. King's Lake Camp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that charging user fees to defray operational expenses did not establish that there was \any real profit motive\
• holding that property used to operate recreational camp was used for charitable purpose and that charging nominal user fees did not divest property of tax exemption
• holding that camp that charged nominal user fees still qualified for exemption even though camp did not absorb cost of those who could not afford it, and instead passed this cost to the user groups
• holding that recreational camp constituted use for charitable purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).