Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Rewire the Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that itemization of work performed accompanied by counsel’s affidavit adequately documented party’s attorney’s fee request
• noting that the use of a clearly erroneous standard of review for factual findings in contempt proceedings \is consistent with the deferential review used by courts in other jurisdictions\
• affirming superior court's determination that members of rural electrical co-op were public interest litigants in suit to remove co-op's directors
• noting clear error standard when reviewing contempt orders is \consistent with the deferential review used by courts in other jurisdictions\ and citing cases illustrating deferential standards of other states
• “This court will reverse a trial judge’s decision regarding contempt only if it is without evidentiary support or is an abuse of discretion.” (quoting Dale v. Dale, 534 S.E.2d 705, 707 (S.C. App. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).