Matanuska Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. Weissler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant electrical association committed trespass because it exceeded the scope of consent when it cleared trees beyond a four foot easement
• holding party trespassed when it cut trees beyond the scope of owner’s permission
• holding party trespassed when it cut trees beyond the scope of owner’s permission
• upholding the trial court’s decision to admit the affidavit of an unavailable witness under Evidence Rule 804(b)(5
• describing history of AS 09.45.730, since amended by Alaska Sess Laws 1988, ch 85, section 16, which was derived from statutory antecedents of ORS 105.810 and ORS 105.815
• approving of trial court’s ruling that the fact that a hearsay “statement also corroborates other testimony” makes it more appropriate to admit under Evidence Rules 804(b)(5) and 803(23)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).