Matamoros v. Starbucks Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rule 23 does not require “perfect symmetry of interests”
• noting that Rule 23 does not require “perfect symmetry of interests”
• shift supervisors are not “wait staff” and therefore are ineligible to share in tips pools with baristas
• “[w]e assume that the ordinary meaning of the statutory language expresses the legislature’s intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).