California Court of Appeal· 2/6/2003
Mata v. Mata
Citations
- 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 141
- 105 Cal. App. 4th 1121
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[A] landowner or possessor generally has no duty to take measures to prevent foreseeable violence occurring off the premises.\
- “[A] landowner or possessor generally has no duty to take measures to prevent foreseeable violence occurring off the premises.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reardon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Delgado v. Trax Bar & GrillCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-06-30· cited 167×
- Troxel v. Iguana Cantina, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-03· cited 41×
- Campbell v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal· 2012-05-21· cited 25×
- Laico v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2004-10-27· cited 16×
- Vazquez v. Lago Grande Homeowners Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-08· cited 10×
- Stone v. Center Trust Retail Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2008-05-30· cited 9×
- Day v. Lupo Vine St., L.P.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-04-11· cited 9×
- Toomer v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 6×
- Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2003-07-30· cited 2×
- Delgado v. Trax Bar & GrillCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-05-28· cited 1×
- Avila v. Jado Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2004-01-14
- Stone v. CENTER TRUST RETAIL PROPERTIESCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-01-23
- Day v. Lupo Vine StreetCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-04-11
- The Irvine Co. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2023-10-24
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-08-08· cited 1,329×
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-12-16· cited 411×
- Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-01-14· cited 147×
- Far West Financial Corp. v. D & S CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-09-15· cited 75×
- Alvarez v. Jacmar Pacific Pizza Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2002-08-06· cited 74×
- Lopez v. BacaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-06-05· cited 72×
- Southland Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-08-05· cited 48×
- Underwriters Insurance v. PurdieCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-07-19· cited 36×
- Marois v. Royal Investigation & Patrol, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1984-11-28· cited 34×
- Saatzer v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-08-12· cited 29×
- People v. HermanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-04-30· cited 28×
- Leakes v. ShamounCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-12-03· cited 17×
- De Vera v. Long Beach Public Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal· 1986-05-06· cited 16×
- Trujillo v. G.A. Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1995-07-18· cited 13×
- Hassoon v. ShamiehCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-05-10· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.