Masurel Worsted Mills, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the matter would have been justiciable as a request for an injunction, the suit for declaratory judgment was capable of federal adjudication
• holding that federal courts had jurisdiction over claim brought under state declaratory-judgment law
• explaining that a case was justiciable when it sought a “definitive adjudication” of a disputed right that would not be “subject to revision by some other and more authoritative agency”
• explaining that “allegations of threatened irreparable injury” are unnecessary in declaratory judgment actions
• applying the same limitation to the Supreme Court’s review of a Tennessee state-court decision based on the state’s declaratory judgment act
• upholding federal court's power to issue declaratory judgments prior to enactment of the Declaratory Judgment Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).