Mastin v. Senkowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying “actual innocence” claim where petitioner presented “allegedly new evidence” that “was cumulative of other significant evidence that placed [a witness’s] credibility at issue”
• Denying actual innocence claim where witness had already been impeached with his extensive criminal history, such that “new [impeachment] evidence certainly would not have transformed him from model citizen to miscreant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).