Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Mastery Charter Sch. v. R.B.

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1280
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 359
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3494
  • 571 U.S. 1230
  • 2014 WL 684487
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a prison doctor doesn’t always have to follow the recommendation of a specialist
  • stating that a prison doctor doesn’t always have to follow the recommendation of a specialist
  • affirming summary judgment where the “totality” of care showed that medical staff paid proper attention to the inmate’s pain
  • affirming grant of summary judgment on claim of deliberate indifference where “totality” of care showed proper attention to inmate’s pain
  • affirming grant of summary judgment on claim of deliberate indifference where “totality” of care showed proper attention to inmate’s pain
  • affirming summary judgment where “totality” of care did not show deliberate indifference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.