Masterson v. Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in the plaintiff’s circumstances, vertigo was not a disability for purposes of the ADA
• denying a breach of contract claim where the employee handbook stated “that [Plaintiff’s] employment was at-will and that [Defendant] reserved the right to amend or modify the terms and conditions of employment at any time or for any reason”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).