Skip to main content
· 10/1/1888

Masterson v. Masterson

Citations

  • 121 Pa. 605
  • 15 A. 652
  • 1888 Pa. LEXIS 696

Syllabus

<p>1. In an action to recover commissions for services rendered as a factor, it is not requisite that the plaintiff should have been in regular business as a commission merchant or broker, and, in the absence of express stipulation, the usual and customary commissions are earned when the services are rendered.</p> <p>2. If, in such an action, a witness for the plaintiff testify that he purchased the goods sold, through the mediation of the plaintiff, it is admissible to show that the goods were purchased by another person, through the assistance of the witness, and that the witness received a commission on the sale from the defendant.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applicant for abandonment has the burden, not the customer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Gordon, Green, Paxson, Sterrett, Trijnkey, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.