Masters v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A It is not essential that appellant have removed the money from the premises of the service station. @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Acosta v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-06-01· cited 57×
• Tinsley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-12-16· cited 27×
• Baker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-10· cited 21×
• Hasley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-05-21· cited 13×
• Locke v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-21· cited 5×
• R- B v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1971-04-16· cited 1×
• Larry D. Cecil Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-08-04
• Monardes, Jaime v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2002-10-31
• Cindy Lee Jahanian v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-05-28