· 8/25/2004
Masters v. Clark
Citations
- 604 S.E.2d 556
- 269 Ga. App. 537
- 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2802
- 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 1132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]here is no magic in the nomenclature used. Under our rules, pleadings are judged by their function and not the name used.”
- “[T]here is no magic in the nomenclature used. Under our rules, pleadings are judged by their function and not the name used.”
- “[T]here is no magic in the nomenclature used. Under our rules, pleadings are judged by their function and not the name used.”
- “[T]here is no magic in the nomenclature used. Under our rules, pleadings are judged by their function and not the name used.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
- “[T]here is no magic in the nomenclature used. Under our rules, pleadings are judged by their function and not the name used.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eldridge, Ruffin, Adams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.