Master Craft Flooring v. Dunham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming Board’s rejection of employee’s testimony that he “looked for work ‘every day,’ pointing specifically to the fact that [the employee] offered no evidence concerning where or for what jobs he had applied, the suitability of those jobs, or the outcome of those applications”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).