Skip to main content
· 6/7/1993

Master Billiard Co. v. Rose

Citations

  • 194 A.D.2d 607
  • 599 N.Y.S.2d 68
  • 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting pre-trial challenge to geographical jurisdiction over falsifying business records charges because there was “no[] dispute that Kings County has jurisdiction over the conspiracy [to falsify business records] count in the indictment based on the commission of overt acts in that county”
  • rejecting pre-trial challenge to geographical jurisdiction over falsifying business records charges because there was “no[] dispute that Kings County has jurisdiction over the conspiracy [to falsify business records] count in the indictment based on the commission of overt acts in that county”
  • “As Kings County has geographical jurisdiction over the conspiracy count, it also has geographical jurisdiction over the substantive crimes which were the object of that conspiracy, regardless of whether the elements of those crimes were committed in Kings County.”
  • “As Kings County has geographical jurisdiction over the conspiracy count, it also has geographical jurisdiction over the substantive crimes which were the object of that conspiracy, regardless of whether the elements of those crimes were committed in Kings County.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.