Mast v. Standard Oil Co. of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an appellate court need not “search voluminous records and exhibits to substantiate an appellant’s claims”
• Court of Appeals is not. required to perform counsel’s work by searching record to attempt to discover facts that establish or defeat motion for summary judgment
• Courts are not “required to perform counsel’s work by searching the record to attempt to discover facts which establish or defeat the [summary judgment] motion.”
• regulation was specific enough to support negligence per se claim despite 3 different possible interpretations of the commonly-understood term “distinctive”
• “It is also the policy of the court that neither we, the trial court, nor the court of appeals should be required to perform counsel’s work by searching the record to attempt to discover facts which establish or defeat the motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).