· 10/4/1984
Mast Industries, Inc. v. Regan
Citations
- 596 F. Supp. 1567
- 8 Ct. Int'l Trade 214
- 8 C.I.T. 214
- 1984 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 1890
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting exhaustion requirement where regulations created import embargo prejudicial to plaintiff and administrative remedy provided “manifestly inadequate” relief
- finding § 1581(i) jurisdiction over a challenge to Customs regulations restricting importation of textiles, which CITA directed be issued
- Requiring negative consequences “would render the ‘military or foreign affairs function’ superfluous since the ‘good cause’ exception . . . would apply.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: DiCARLO
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.