Skip to main content
· 10/4/1984

Mast Industries, Inc. v. Regan

Citations

  • 596 F. Supp. 1567
  • 8 Ct. Int'l Trade 214
  • 8 C.I.T. 214
  • 1984 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 1890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting exhaustion requirement where regulations created import embargo prejudicial to plaintiff and administrative remedy provided “manifestly inadequate” relief
  • finding § 1581(i) jurisdiction over a challenge to Customs regulations restricting importation of textiles, which CITA directed be issued
  • Requiring negative consequences “would render the ‘military or foreign affairs function’ superfluous since the ‘good cause’ exception . . . would apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DiCARLO

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.