Massis v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court lacks jurisdiction to consider an argument that was not raised before the Board and providing no exception for manifest injustice
• noting that we may consider such a claim only if the petitioner “has exhausted all administrative remedies available . . . as of right.”
• finding lack of exhaustion because petitioner completely failed to contest below whether reckless endangerment was crime of violence
• finding lack of exhaustion because petitioner completely failed to contest below whether reckless endangerment was crime of violence
• rejecting argument, raised for the first time on appeal, that a state law did not constitute a \crime of violence\ under the INA
• rejecting argument, raised for the first time on appeal, that a state law did not constitute a “crime of violence” under the INA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).