Massey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that district court is in best position to weigh various sentencing options
• “When both consecutive and concurrent sentencing options are authorized by the Sentencing 5 Guidelines, compelling circumstances must be shown before the trial court’s decision will be reversed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rasinski
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-02-06· cited 4×
• State v. Schwab
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-04-21· cited 4×
• State v. Beamon
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-04-11· cited 3×
• State v. Nunn
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-01-13· cited 2×
• State v. Crapser
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-12-10· cited 2×
• State v. Hendrickson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-06-09· cited 2×
• State v. Nolder
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-11-13· cited 2×
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-09-10· cited 2×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-04-09· cited 1×
• State v. Longo
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-03-26

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kindem
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-07· cited 267×
• State v. Back
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-09· cited 96×
• State v. Montalvo
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-01· cited 32×
• State v. Freyer
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-12-30· cited 20×
• State v. Sherwood
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1983-12-21· cited 14×